Prepare for a provider conversation
Bring published rates, Medicare-relative comparisons, provider relationships, and supporting market context into one evidence-backed view.
Regional market & contracting intelligence
Healthdex helps TPAs, regional networks, and community health systems evaluate providers, benchmark negotiated rates, and understand local markets—without building an enterprise analytics operation.
One evidence graphCurrent platform insights use governed public data; claims-derived analytics and regulatory network adequacy are not yet available. Future customer claims must be de-identified before Healthdex receives them. Membership and eligibility data, individual member analysis, and member disruption are not part of the product scope.
From question to decision
Start with a regional provider, rate, or market question. Healthdex connects the relevant public evidence, preserves its lineage and limitations, and helps your team build a clear position for the decision ahead.
See the decision workflowDecisions Healthdex supports
Bring published rates, Medicare-relative comparisons, provider relationships, and supporting market context into one evidence-backed view.
Understand which providers serve a market, how they are connected, and where the available public evidence warrants deeper investigation.
Compare facilities at an explicit billing-code and payer grain while preserving the records, methodologies, and limitations behind the result.
Connect provider footprints, ownership, public quality, financial condition, and community context to clarify the local landscape.
Turn a complex regional question into a clear, source-backed analysis stakeholders can inspect, challenge, and use responsibly.
Trace an analytical result to publisher artifacts, source coordinates, transformations, and explicit data-quality or limitation states.
One connected decision workflow
Define the geography, providers, services, and payer context that matter—without starting from a maze of disconnected public files.
Compare published rates and connect provider, ownership, quality, financial, and community evidence in a common market view.
Keep the sources, definitions, methodologies, and limits visible so stakeholders can understand what the evidence does—and does not—support.
Built for lean regional teams
Healthdex gives teams without large data-engineering or analytics operations a practical way to investigate local markets and prepare for consequential conversations.
Strengthen employer, broker, network, and provider conversations with clearer local-market and published-rate evidence.
Evaluate competitive position, payer rates, ownership relationships, financial context, and public community need.
Move from raw public files to connected, governed intelligence without losing the source trail or analytical limitations.
Research library
White paper
How to assess source identity, dates, completeness, methodologies, and publication eligibility before using a rate.
Methodology brief
A reproducible framework for choosing a payment family, period, setting, numerator, denominator, and comparison basis.
Demo
See how Healthdex connects provider identity, ownership, market context, and hospital-published rates without erasing uncertainty.
Healthdex news
Intelligence update
Healthdex publishes product and research updates for leaders working with provider, rate, quality, ownership, and community evidence.
Frequently asked questions
It is the structured analysis of hospital-published standard charge files. Healthdex preserves facility identity, payer and plan labels, billing-code grain, methodology, source dates, quality states, and record-level provenance.
Healthdex compares supported hospital-published rates only at an explicitly selected grain and shows the coverage and source records behind the result. It does not silently mix rate methodologies or infer claims utilization.
Rate provenance is the evidence chain from a displayed result back to the publisher artifact, source location, acquisition record, normalization method, and governed decisions used to produce it.
The current product uses governed public evidence. It does not ingest membership or eligibility data and does not produce individual member analysis or member disruption conclusions.
Bring us a regional market question